|
|
Executive Summary
|
 |
| click to enlarge |
|
 |
To support the Ecoregion-based conservation
of the unique and globally significant
biodiversity in Armenia, Azerbaijan
and Georgia
|
 |
By providing long-term co-financing for
operating costs of protected areas,
which include costs of:
|
| |
 |
Staff salaries and training
|
| |
 |
Fuel, including for patrolling and monitoring
on a regular basis
|
| |
 |
Purchase and replacement of necessary equipment
and supplies, including vehicles
|
| |
 |
Maintenance of equipment and existing infrastructure,
including for tourism
|
| |
 |
Office operations and public information
and awareness-raising
|
 |
All within the framework of an Ecoregional
Conservation Plan which integrates the
protected areas into overall land use
plans which include sustainable use
and community-based management of natural
resources outside of, and sometimes
within, the protected area borders.
|
|
|
Mission Statement
The CPAF’s mission is to support the
ongoing operations and maintenance of
protected areas in the South Caucasus
countries of Armenia, Azerbaijan and
Georgia.
The Caucasus is a biological crossroads,
where species from Central and Northern
Europe, Central Asia, the Middle East
and North Africa mingle with endemics
(local species found nowhere else).
Extremes in altitude, broad variations
in climate, soil and vegetative conditions
has led to a broad range of landscapes
and unusually high levels of species
diversity, including more than 50 species
of globally threatened animals.
The area furthermore contains one of
the world’s largest old-growth forests
in a temperate zone, providing a valuable
carbon-sink in the world’s battle against
climate change as well as a refuge for
much of the region’s fauna. Conservation
International has designated the Caucasus
as one of its 34 “bio-diversity hotspots”
around the world.
Unfortunately this rich and diverse
global treasure is seriously threatened.
Critical problems include un-sustainable
development, destruction of forests
for fuel and poaching, and a severe
shortage of funds to do the day-to-day
conservation work. It has been estimated
that current government budgets cover
less than 20% of the funds necessary
to effectively operate the priority
areas.
In response to these threats, a group
of more than 100 regional and international
scientists and policy makers have been
collaborating since 2000 to produce
a single ecoregional conservation plan
(the ECP) which proposes the integration
of the existing collection of individual
protected areas in the region into an
expanded trans-boundary network of PAs
and connecting corridors.
There are about 80 existing PAs within
the three countries. Most already existed
in one form or another prior to the
demise of the USSR. About 20 of the
PAs are major national parks and strict
nature reserves. Of these larger PAs,
a number have benefited from international
donor funds in recent years, including
grants from Germany’s BMZ, Norway and
the World Bank. These grants, however,
typically do not assure long-term funding
for ongoing operating and maintenance
costs.
The ECP’s planned expansion of the system
of protected areas will be of limited
value if their ongoing operations cannot
be funded. As in much of the developing
world, there is a serious risk that
PAs in the three core Caucasus countries
end up as “paper parks”, i.e., PAs that
are demarcated as protected on a map
but which in reality are poached and
exploited much as unprotected land.
The CPAF’s primary focus will therefore
be to tackle this unaddressed but critical
need. We will assure the funding of:
salaries for rangers and park scientists;
information office programs; equipment
and facilities maintenance; training;
and similar day-to-day costs of protected
areas that are in priority conservation
areas under the ECP.
While the Caucasus Ecoregion spreads
into parts of Russia, Turkey and Iran,
its core lies in the territories of
Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, 100%
of which are in the Caucasus. For a
variety of reasons, the CPAF has focused
its mission on these three countries.
The ECP’s trans-national approach is
essential given the number and size
of the countries and territories that
form the Ecoregion. Many of the areas
to be protected lie on borders, and
animals require the ecoregional—and
not the political—space for their migration,
breeding and feeding. The governments
in the region have agreed in principle
to back this effort. This cooperation
has particular significance in a region
with lingering territorial conflicts.
Since the three core Caucasus countries
gained their independence in the early
1990s, poverty has remained a problem:
2006 per capita GDP was $2,130 in Armenia,
$1,750 in Georgia, and $2,360 in Azerbaijan,
which unlike its neighbors has the benefit
of oil and gas reserves in the Caspian.
These are about 5% of Western per capita
GDP levels.
The CPAF’s underlying philosophy is
that governments with limited resources
will be encouraged to maintain and develop
their protected area systems if they
know that a portion of the cost of running
them can be covered elsewhere.
Under the ECP, the PAs are integrated
into the overall land-use plans which
include sustainable use and community-based
management of natural resources outside
of, and sometimes within, the PA borders.
In this way, it is planned that the
ECP and PAs will involve and receive
the support of local rural communities.
This will be as crucial to their success
as the support of the governments.
In summary, the Caucasus Protected Areas
Fund will contribute directly to:
|
 |
| |

|
Nature and Bio-diversity.
Protection of one of the world’s
uniquely endowed regions.
|
| |

|
Climate and Carbon. Securing
carbon sinks by protecting intact
forest areas including remaining
old growth forests (reduced
emissions from deforestation
and degradation (REDD)).
|
| |

|
People and Progress. Promotion
of sustainable economic development
in a culturally rich but
economically impoverished region
by supporting:
|
| |
|
|
 |
stable jobs in parks and
reserves;
|
| |
|
|
 |
related employment and economic
growth as tourism develops;
|
| |
|
|
 |
educational initiatives
on conservation in the parks;
and
|
| |
|
|
 |
civil society (NGO and private
sector) actors who will help
us design and implement our
programs.
|
|
|
|
|